Specification sheet Wheel Loader Ref ranger-969-wheel-loader
Ranger 969
The Ranger 969 is a wheel loader with an operating weight of 40,785.52 lb (18,500 kg), a 234.1 hp engine, and a 4.71 yd³ (3.6 m³) bucket.
✓ QA-verified — every figure checked for unit consistency, physical possibility, and class plausibility; failures withheld → Operating weight
40,785.52lb
18,500kg
Engine power
234.1hp
174.5kW
Net Power Bucket capacity
4.71yd³
3.6m³
◆Where it sits in its classpercentile · small wheel loaders
Among 439 small wheel loaders (22,000–45,000 lb), the Ranger 969 sits at the heavy end of its class:
- Operating weight 40,790 lb heavier than 87% (n=439)
- Engine power 234 hp more powerful than 96% (n=408)
- Bucket capacity 4.7 yd³ larger-bucket than 94% (n=387)
◇Scale drawingdrawn to scale · mm
01 Engine Specification
| Number Of Cylinders | 6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Engine Make | 2236 | |
| Engine Model | 3306B | |
| Net Power | 234.1hp | 174.5kw |
| Power Measured @ | 2200rpm | |
| Displacement | 593.2cu in | 9.8L |
02 Operational Specification
| Operating Weight | 40785.6lb | 18500kg |
|---|---|---|
| Static Tipping Weight | 13227.8lb | 6000kg |
| Turning Radius | 24.1ft in | 7332mm |
| Tire Size | 23.5x25 |
03 Transmission Specification
| Transmission Type | Electrohydrostatic | |
|---|---|---|
| Number Of Forward Gears | 4 | |
| Number Of Reverse Gears | 3 | |
| Max Speed - Forward | 22.4mph | 36km/h |
| Max Speed - Reverse | 14.3mph | 23km/h |
04 Bucket Dimensions
| Dump Clearance At Max Raise | 10.67ft in | 3250mm |
|---|---|---|
| Bucket Width | 10.54ft in | 3210mm |
| Bucket Capacity - Heaped | 4.71yd3 | 3.6m3 |
05 Dimensions Dimensions
| Ground Clearance | 1.5ft in | 457mm |
|---|---|---|
| Length With Bucket On Ground | 27.36ft in | 8338mm |
| Width Over Tires | 8.99ft in | 2740mm |
| Height To Top Of Cab | 11.09ft in | 3380mm |
| Wheelbase | 11.32ft in | 3450mm |
| Reach At Max Lift And Dump | 3.39ft in | 1033mm |
Method. Figures are manufacturer reference specifications, not measurements. Every value is checked for unit consistency, physically possible magnitude, and plausibility for its equipment class before publication; figures that fail any check are withheld rather than shown, and figures reconstructed from related data are marked above. Imperial and metric figures are reproduced as published, except where a note states otherwise.