Specification sheet Mini Excavator Ref hitachi-ex22-mini-excavator

Hitachi EX22

The Hitachi EX22 is a mini excavator with a 18.2 hp engine, and a dig depth of 8.01 ft.

✓ QA-verified — every figure checked for physical possibility and class plausibility; failures withheld →
Engine power
18.2hp
 
Net Power
Dig depth
8.01ft
 

Where it sits in its classpercentile · mini excavators

Among 479 mini excavators , the Hitachi EX22 sits below the median for its class:

  • Engine power 18 hp less powerful than 71% (n=448)
  • Dig depth 8 ft shallower-digging than 67% (n=426)

Not positioned on operating weight — withheld or unpublished for this machine.

01 Boom/Stick Option (Hex) 1 Specification

Max Vertical Wall Digging Depth 6.39ft in 1,948mm — metric converted from the published imperial value
Max Digging Depth 8.01ft in 2,441mm — metric converted from the published imperial value

02 Dimensions Specification

Width To Outside Of Tracks 4.6ft in 1,402mm — metric converted from the published imperial value
Height To Top Of Cab 7.73ft in 2,356mm — metric converted from the published imperial value
Tail Swing Radius 0.83ft in 253mm — metric converted from the published imperial value

03 Undercarriage Specification

04 Engine Specification

Engine Make Kubota
Engine Model D1105-KA
Gross Power 18.3hp 13.6kw — metric converted from the published imperial value
Net Power 18.2hp 13.6kw — metric converted from the published imperial value
Power Measured @ 2200rpm
Displacement 68.6cu in 1,124cm3 — metric converted from the published imperial value
Max Torque 47.8lb ft
Torque Measured @ 1500rpm

05 Operational Specification

Data notes

Converted metric figure. The source published imperial figures only for this machine. Metric figures marked ‖ are unit conversions of the published imperial value, rounded to the same precision — they are not separately published measurements. Because there is no independently published metric figure to compare against, no cross-unit consistency check applies to them; the imperial figures they derive from were checked for physically possible magnitude and for plausibility against this equipment class.

Method. Figures are manufacturer reference specifications, not measurements. The source published imperial figures for this machine in a single unit system, so no cross-unit consistency check applies; every value is checked for physically possible magnitude and for plausibility against its equipment class before publication. Figures that fail either check are withheld rather than shown, and figures reconstructed from related data are marked above. Metric figures marked ‖ are converted from the published imperial value rather than reproduced from the source.