Specification sheet Mini Excavator Ref case-cx55b-mini-excavator

Case CX55B

The Case CX55B is a mini excavator with an operating weight of 11,309.8 lb, a 37.5 hp engine, and a dig depth of 12.1 ft.

✓ QA-verified — every figure checked for physical possibility and class plausibility; failures withheld →
Operating weight
11,309.8lb
 
Engine power
37.5hp
 
Net Power
Dig depth
12.1ft
 

Where it sits in its classpercentile · mini excavators

Among 479 mini excavators , the Case CX55B sits at the heavy end of its class:

  • Operating weight 11,310 lb heavier than 91% (n=438)
  • Engine power 38 hp more powerful than 80% (n=448)
  • Dig depth 12.1 ft deeper-digging than 93% (n=426)

01 Boom/Stick Option (Hex) 1 Specification

02 Dimensions Specification

03 Undercarriage Specification

04 Engine Specification

Emissions Level Tier 4
Engine Model Yanmar 4 TNV 88
Net Power 37.5hp 28kw — metric converted from the published imperial value
Power Measured @ 2400rpm

05 Lift System Specification

Bucket Breakout Force 11105.6lb 5,037.41kg — metric converted from the published imperial value
Lift Over Side Max. Reach 1080.3lb 490.02kg — metric converted from the published imperial value
Lift Over End Max. Reach - Lbs 1322.8lb 600.01kg — metric converted from the published imperial value

06 Operational Specification

Operating Weight 11309.8lb 5,130.03kg — metric converted from the published imperial value
Hydraulic System Relief Valve Pressure 3336psi 23,001kpa — metric converted from the published imperial value
Hydraulic Pump Flow Capacity 26.4gal/min 99.9l/min — metric converted from the published imperial value

07 Boom Specification

Data notes

Converted metric figure. The source published imperial figures only for this machine. Metric figures marked ‖ are unit conversions of the published imperial value, rounded to the same precision — they are not separately published measurements. Because there is no independently published metric figure to compare against, no cross-unit consistency check applies to them; the imperial figures they derive from were checked for physically possible magnitude and for plausibility against this equipment class.

Method. Figures are manufacturer reference specifications, not measurements. The source published imperial figures for this machine in a single unit system, so no cross-unit consistency check applies; every value is checked for physically possible magnitude and for plausibility against its equipment class before publication. Figures that fail either check are withheld rather than shown, and figures reconstructed from related data are marked above. Metric figures marked ‖ are converted from the published imperial value rather than reproduced from the source.